Recent Blogs

Chromatography might sound complex, but it’s incredibly valuable in a range of industries—from pharmaceuticals to environmental science and even forensics. Whether ensuring the purity of your water, the safety of your food, or the effectiveness of your medications, chromatography is everywhere, silently working behind the scenes. What do you think? Could this technique have more influence on your daily life than you realized?

Now that we’ve walked through which components GC won’t detect, it’s clear that while gas chromatography is powerful, it’s not universal. Large biomolecules, salts, and thermally unstable compounds are best left to other methods like liquid chromatography or mass spectrometry. Does this mean GC isn’t useful? Of course not! It’s still the go-to for analyzing volatile organic compounds, and when paired with the right detector, it’s incredibly versatile.

Introduction Gas Chromatography (GC) is a powerful analytical tool used in various fields, from pharmaceuticals to environmental testing. One of the most crucial aspects of this technique is identifying peaks in the chromatogram. Peaks represent the components in your sample, but if you don’t properly identify them, you could misinterpret

While the first peak in gas chromatography is usually associated with the solvent or carrier gas, it still plays an important role in the overall analysis. By understanding and interpreting this peak correctly, you can ensure that your injection was successful, your system is functioning properly, and your chromatogram is reliable.

In a nutshell, chromatography labs are the unsung heroes of scientific research and industry. They ensure the purity and safety of everything from the medications we take to the water we drink. Without them, we’d be flying blind, unable to detect potentially harmful substances hiding in plain sight.

Mass spectrometry’s reputation as a destructive technique is well-earned. While it provides incredibly detailed information, it comes at the cost of the sample itself. For some, this trade-off is worth it—especially when dealing with complex mixtures or when the level of detail provided by mass spectrometry is crucial. However, if sample preservation is a priority, non-destructive techniques like NMR or IR spectroscopy might be better suited to your needs.